‘Anti-value in motion: Labour, real subsumption and the struggles against capitalism’. ‘A post-work economy of robots and machines is a bad utopia for the left’. ‘Organizar la esperanza: Utopías concretas pluriversales contra y más allá de la forma valor’. New York-Aldershot: Palgrave MacMillan.ĭinerstein, A. The politics of autonomy in Latin America. ‘Interstitial revolution: On the explosive fusion of negativity and hope’. Aldershot-Burlington: Ashgate.ĭinerstein, A. Neary (Eds.), The labour debate: An investigation into the theory and reality of capitalist work (pp. ‘Regaining materiality: Unemployment and the invisible subjectivity of labour’. (Eds.), The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Reality of Capitalist Work (Aldershot: Ashgate), 135–148.ĭinerstein, A. Marx, marginalism & modern sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber. Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. Moylan (Eds.), Not yet: Reconsidering Ernst Bloch (pp. ‘Utopian projections: In memory of Ernst Bloch’. Mexico Profundo: Una Civilización Negada. ‘Bringing critical theory back in at a time of misery: Three beginnings without conclusion’. London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury.īonefeld, W. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.īoldyrev, I. (1963) (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag).īloch, E. Original edition: Tubinger Einleitung in die Philosophie, Vol. A Philosophy of the Future (New York: Herder and Herder), Internet Archive 2010, Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation. México: Taberna Librería Editores.īloch, E. Martínez Andrade (eds.), Esperanza y utopía: Ernst Bloch desde América Latina (pp. ‘El principio esperanza desde América Latina’. Prefigurative critique of political economyĪínsa, F.Both kinds of concrete utopia navigate the open veins of capital. They ‘appear’ outside but in fact constitute a threat to the expansion of value. She offers the notion of ‘subsumption by exclusion’ to argue for a particular form of subordination of indigenous peoples in capital. In the final section, Dinerstein enquiries about the adequacy of the term concrete utopia to understand indigenous struggles for self-determination. Like this, Marx’s critique becomes a prefigurative critique of political economy that recognises the process of shaping concrete utopia as a critique of the value form from within the process of the self-expansion of value. Yet, in order to grasp concrete utopias, Marx’s critique should be read ‘in the key of hope’, that is through the lenses of Bloch’s principle of hope. Dinerstein suggests that Marx’s critique of political economy constitutes the most unforgiving critique of capitalist society. Concrete utopias are ‘denaturalising’ capitalist-colonial society as they are negating the given and creating alternative practices at the grass roots. Dinerstein argues that the form of utopia today is not abstract but ‘concrete’.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |